Ethanol advocates claim that the biofuel is a cheap, renewable energy source that reduces pollution and our dependence on foreign oil. It sounds too good to be true—and it is.A concise but accurate summary of the situation.
Ethanol, especially the corn-based variety, is bad for taxpayers, bad for consumers, bad for the environment, and horrible for the world's poor. In fact, even environmentalists are critical of ethanol subsidies these days. The ethanol craze has distorted markets and increased the price of food worldwide. The only people who still support ethanol subsidies are the ethanol producers—and politicians from both sides of the aisle. Together, they make sure the subsidies keep coming.
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Financial and environmental costs of ethanol
The following short video is from Reason.tv. It examines the financial and environmental costs of ethanol.
Labels:
audio/video
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment