tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5404820640426099135.post3744318136514765907..comments2023-10-31T00:46:35.316+13:00Comments on Anti-Dismal: What those who followed Smith also got wrongPaul Walkerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13731003529546075700noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5404820640426099135.post-86591887257918097182016-04-12T14:06:31.860+12:002016-04-12T14:06:31.860+12:00Correction: 'The Nature of the Firm' (1937...Correction: 'The Nature of the Firm' (1937). <br /><br />RSRSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5404820640426099135.post-82021424295359212942016-04-12T14:03:48.658+12:002016-04-12T14:03:48.658+12:00'In fact it took till around 1970 before anyon...'In fact it took till around 1970 before anyone decided to take the firm seriously.'<br /><br />What about that seminal paper 'Nature of the Firm' (1937) written by that Nobel laureate Ronald Coase? I take it that by "anyone", thus, you must mean rather "many people"?<br /><br />Riko StevensRiko Stevensnoreply@blogger.com